Uber Can"t Operate in Nevada Pending Regulator Case

By Edvard Pettersson | November 26, 2014

Uber Technologies Inc. was blocked from operating in Nevada by a judge in Reno after regulators succeeded in getting the case taken from a judge in Las Vegas who had refused the halt the mobile car-booking service.

Nevada District Court Judge Scott Freeman yesterday granted the state’s request to halt Uber’s operations pending the outcome of a lawsuit over whether the business is operating legally. The Nevada Transportation Authority alleges Uber, which began service in the state last month, doesn’t have the required license to transport passengers.

San Francisco-based Uber has run into controversies as it has debuted in new markets, including roiling established taxi and limousine industries and facing regulatory hurdles. Some drivers for the service have also complained about the company’s commission structure.

The Nevada Supreme Court 2 days ago denied Uber’s request to halt the case in Reno in favor of the state’s lawsuit in Las Vegas. Nevada regulators had brought legal action in 3 different state jurisdictions and a judge in Las Vegas last month had denied the transportation authority’s request to immediately shut down Uber.

“We will continue to work with regulators and state leaders as we evaluate this development,” Eva Behrend, a spokeswoman for Uber, said when asked for comment on Freeman’s ruling.

The case is NV Transportation v. Uber Technologies, CV14-02284, Second Judicial District Court, Nevada (Reno).

Copyright 2014 Bloomberg.

« Previous article

Insurers’ Winter Storm Losses to Climb Due to Polar Vortex: I.I.I.

Next article »

Wyoming Up Nearly Double So Far From Last Year

Like this article?

Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Uber Can"t Operate in Nevada Pending Regulator Case

Ford’s New Everest Is the Rugged Seven-Seat Off-Roader We Want But Can’t Have

Ford just unveiled a rugged but correct-sized off-roader, a physique-on-frame 6-seater with EcoBoost turbo or torquey diesel power and an accessible 6-speed manual transmission. The 2015 Everest is the perfect car for people who value rough country prowess over cute-ute deception. Supplied, of course, these people reside in China, Australia, New Zealand, or basically anywhere that’s not the U.S. or Europe. Dammit.

The Ford Everest’s spec sheet is tantalizing for off-road nerds. Physique-on-frame construction, a strong rear axle, and a genuine locking transfer case with a accurate low range give this truck all the bona fides that have kept Jeep in enterprise with the rock-crawling set. Meanwhile, a higher-tech Terrain Management System offers street, sand, snow, and off-road settings, managing throttle response, torque vectoring and hill handle like the systems identified in pricey Land Rovers. An electronic locking rear diff and digital displays for vehicle pitch and roll round out the off-road gear.

Petrolheads can option the Everest with the 2.-liter EcoBoost turbo 4 banger we know from the Ford Fusion, even though diesel geeks can decide on from a 2.2-liter 4 or 3.2-liter 5-cylinder turbo oil burner. Either diesel can be matched to an truthful-to-god 6-speed stick, or the 6-speed auto from the F-series pickup. It is a far cry from Ford’s U.S. marketplace body-on-frame 6-seater, the ponderously large and not at all off-road oriented Expedition.

So who gets to play with all this off-road goodness? Beginning in 2015, the Everest will be offered in China, Australia, New Zealand, India, and Southeast Asia. Later next year, the automobile will expand to Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa.

---

---

As for us folks in North America hoping for a 6-seater with a stick shift and some genuine off-road chops? I dunno, possibly bolt some jump seats into the trunk of a Jeep Wrangler Limitless.

Ford’s New Everest Is the Rugged Seven-Seat Off-Roader We Want But Can’t Have

Euro-Sorts Can Rent a Concentrate ST-H, We Can not Due to the fact Your Buddies Can’t Drive a Manual

August 21, 2014 at 6:21 pm by Alex Kierstein | Photography by Ford Europe

This is why these statistics about the number of Americans who can drive a manual transmission will catch up to the typical Joe at the rental counter: In Europe, you can rent one particular of these Concentrate ST-Hs. But until Americans can figure out the whole clutch factor, it is not hunting promising for the U.S.

One more purpose Americans need to have to find out to drive stick? So @Hertz will offer you this in the US, not just Europe. #FocusST pic.twitter.com/ukoDSs3hiq

— Roger Garbow (@rogergarbow) August 20, 2014

For about a year, Ford has quietly provided the 252-hp manual-only hatch by way of Hertz outlets in pick European markets, and in the Netherlands Ford has announced there will be a Fiesta ST-H obtainable to rent as well—that’s an fascinating prospect. But since the Focus ST is not presented with an automatic, it will take a lot of effort (or Hertz scrounging up the money for continual clutch replacements) ahead of a stateside move is probably.
Study Far more: The Rental – Texas in the Hertz Penske Mustang GT

The Concentrate ST-H is primarily a Recaro-optioned regular ST painted up in the classic gold-stripes-more than-black Hertz livery like the Shelby GT350Hs prior to it. Of course, enormous torque steer comes regular.

Do not beat a path to the nearest Hertz looking for a boosted front-driver. You can, even so, rent something in the existing Adrenaline Collection, which at present involves the Challenger R/T, the superb Hertz Penske Mustang GT or GT Premium, Corvette Stingray Coupe and Convertible, and Camaro SS Coupe or Convertible.

Related: New Ford Focus ST will debut at Goodwood

---

---

Other Stories You May possibly Like

---

Euro-Sorts Can Rent a Concentrate ST-H, We Can not Due to the fact Your Buddies Can’t Drive a Manual

Court Ruling States Arizona Can’t Deny Immigrants Driver’s Licenses

Arizona’s policy of denying driver’s licenses to men and women who came to the U.S. illegally as young children was blocked by a federal appeals court in San Francisco, which stated the measure is possibly unconstitutional.

The policy most most likely violates equal protection rights of people covered under the federal “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” plan, the court mentioned these days, approving a temporary order blocking enforcement although a legal challenge to the policy proceeds.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who backed the state’s very first- of-its-type crackdown on undocumented immigrants in 2010, referred to as the deferred action plan a “lawless directive” that does not give immigrants “authorized presence” in the U.S.

“It is outrageous, though not entirely surprising, that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has once once again dealt a blow to Arizona’s capacity to enforce its laws,” Brewer, a Republican, stated in an e-mailed statement. “The ruling is specially disturbing given the present influx of illegal aliens, a crisis President Obama designed and escalated.”

The quantity of unaccompanied, undocumented children crossing the U.S. border with Mexico is on the rise. Much more than 52,000 unaccompanied young children have arrived at the border this fiscal year even though June 15, about double the quantity in a related period in 2013, according to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Obama on June 30 asked Congress for emergency funds and legal authority to stem the increasing flow of kids into the U.S. and mentioned legislation may be necessary to increase penalties for folks smuggling them.

The 2012 “deferred action” initiative lets any person who came to the U.S. illegally ahead of age 16 and is in school, has no criminal record and meets other requirements remain in the country and obtain a perform permit.

The 3-judge panel said beneficiaries of the program in Arizona were likely to succeed on the merits of their lawsuit claiming the state’s rules prohibited them from getting driver’s licenses are illegal.

The U.S. Supreme Court scaled back parts of Arizon’s 2010 immigration law, ruling the federal government has exclusive authority to set immigration policy.

“After but another loss in court, Arizona need to cease its senseless battle against immigrants,” Victor Viramontes, an lawyer with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund representing 5 individuals suing Arizona, stated in an e-mail.

Brewer stated she was contemplating options to appeal today’s ruling.

The case is Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Brewer, 13-16248, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (San Francisco).

Copyright 2014 Bloomberg.

Court Ruling States Arizona Can’t Deny Immigrants Driver’s Licenses