Motorists can now plea against minor fines on-line

A new service referred to as “Make a Plea” is being rolled out across the UK this month and it means that motorists now have an option to submitting their plea against motor fines by way of the post or possessing to go to court.

This service is for individuals who have committed minor or low-level driving offences such as driving with no the suitable insurance or speeding. They will be capable to use the site to respond to their charge in a bid to modernise the way some of our systems work.

The Courts Minister, Shailesh Vara stated: “This is bringing the courts and tribunal service to the modern day technological era.

“This is some thing that will imply there is going to be less paper around, less use of people, significantly less use of office space, and a complete variety of items that will truly save true funds, and that cash can be utilised elsewhere.

“Digital technologies give us an opportunity to make the justice system easier, clearer and more rapidly – and part of this indicates reducing or removing the unnecessary movement of paper and individuals around the technique.”

Not only could the new method save funds but also save time which in turn saves money as well. This is since it will decrease the quantity of time that the police and courts take to approach all the minor driving offences that go by means of the technique each year (estimated to be about 4.5 million). Hopefully, if the new service does totally free up the time of the courts and the police this time can be far better spent dealing with much more complicated cases which is a single of the factors many motoring groups are backing the new service.

A spokesman for the RAC, Simon Williams, stated: “Our courts deal with a large quantity of minor motoring offences every single year, so it tends to make absolute sense that in the 21st century we use safe internet technology to relieve some of the pressure.

“Make a Plea should speed things up for motorists and the courts alike, freeing the latter up to deal with the much more severe motoring offences such as unsafe driving.”

The service will be available to defendants 24 hours a day and will allow them to respond to their charge through the safe site utilizing any compatible device i.e. smart telephone, tablet or desktop.

The Ministry of Justice has stated that the service will let for the defendant to get the maximum amount of credit for responding to a charge promptly as effectively as make the process a lot easier than it has been in the past.

The programme has currently been trialled in Greater Manchester where 1,200 drivers utilized the service to register their pleas against their charges. The new technique not only provides them the selection to register their plea but also lets defendants see their case information as nicely as view all the proof.

All round, digitalising the technique tends to make sense for motorists specially when it will make the procedure for registering a defence considerably simpler. Let us know your thoughts under!

Photo by Pixabay

The post Motorists can now plea against minor fines on the web appeared very first on 1st Insurance coverage Blog.

Motorists can now plea against minor fines on-line

Justice Project offers Clarification on unpaid traffic fines

On Tuesday 9 February 2015 the Road Traffic infringement Agency put out a media release with the grossly misleading headline: “UNPAID FINES BLOCK LICENSING BY AUTHORITIES”.

While the content of the release vaguely clarifies the matter and correctly states that an Enforcement Order will result in licensing transactions, it is important that this not be confused with a “traffic fine”.

In terms of Section 20(2) of the AARTO Act, the Registrar may authorise the issue of an Enforcement Order if he has satisfied himself that both, an infringement notice and a courtesy letter have been served on the alleged infringer by the prescribed means. In the case of an infringement notice this could be service that occurs in person at the time of the alleged infringement or by registered mail if it is served after the fact and in the case of a courtesy letter, this must be served by registered mail. An enforcement order must also be served by registered mail.

The more recent licence renewal notifications contain a misleading statement which reads as follows:

” Your application for a new Driving Licence Card or PrDP will not be processed unless all Enforcement Orders have been settled and all penalties and courtesy letter fees for outstanding Infringements are settled. Visit www.aarto.gov.za“

While the first part of the statement is true, the second part of it is untrue and is used by licensing authorities to mislead people into believing that they are compelled to settle ALL outstanding infringement notices including but not limited to the illegal infringement notices the JMPD issued from 1 June 2010 to 21 December 2012. The findings of the Public Protector on this issue was that the JMPD violated the provisions of the AARTO Act and as a result, the improperly served infringement notices were “irregular” and amounted to maladministration.

Motorists are advised to look closely at the part of this notification to see if an Enforcement Order has been issued against their particulars. If it says “Enforcement Order outstanding: No/Nee” and a licence disc is not automatically printed, motorists should ask for a R114 eNaTIS statement to determine whether they have outstanding licensing fees or penalties owing on other vehicles registered in their name, or a warrant of arrest issued against them by courts in the jurisdictions outside of the operational areas of the Johannesburg and Tshwane Metro Police Departments.

Licensing authorities have become fond of preying on the ignorance of the average motorist who does not know and/or understand the legislative provisions that allow blocking of licensing transactions. They also appear to be of the opinion that traffic fines are somehow excluded from the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven which is enshrined in Section 35 of the Constitution.

The media release by the RTIA should be viewed as a statement by the RTIA that they are going to resume following the legislated provisions of the AARTO Act and nothing more. Motorists who ignore infringement notices issued against their names are doing themselves no favours and would be better advised to deal with their traffic fines as quickly as possible when they receive them.

Admitting guilt and paying a traffic fine, whether it is issued under the AARTO Act or the Criminal Procedure Act is ONE of the options but it is not the only one. Any person has the unalienable right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and is fully entitled to mount a defence against any accusation of violation of any law – including traffic infringements/offences.

The RTIA is also tasked with EDUCATING people about the AARTO Act, but as yet, almost 7 years into the so-called “pilot phase” of the implementation of the AARTO Act, it has done very little to educate motorists and this is very sad indeed.

Anyone who wishes to educate themselves on the provisions of both, the AARTO Act or the Criminal Procedure Act is welcome to visit JPSA’s dedicated AARTO website at www.aarto.co.za. This must not be confused with the RTIA’s AARTO website is located at www.aarto.gov.za which does not present any of the abuses that have been perpetrated by authorities operating under the AARTO Act.

Howard Dembovsky

National Chairman – Justice Project South Africa (NPC)

Justice Project offers Clarification on unpaid traffic fines

Digital speed cameras blamed for enhance in fines

Digital speed cameras are less expensive to run and can be employed 24/7. They are believed to be the principal reason for a recent rise in the number of speeding fines.

The number of drivers facing heavy fines for speeding has risen to a 4-year higher, new government statistics show.

And campaigners say a new wave of digital speed cameras, which can be switched on 24 hours a day, might be to blame.

Court fines highest considering that 2010

Figures from the Ministry of Justice show that in 2013-14, the number of motorists issued with court fines of £100 or much more for breaking the speed limit rose past 115,000.

This represented the highest level given that the coalition came to energy in 2010.

One particular of the most important elements behind this rise in the quantity of fines is the increasing use of digital speed cameras.

These are less expensive to run and administer as they do not need to have film loaded and collected.

As a result, they are far more most likely to be in use around the clock as opposed to film cameras which are only switched on at specific occasions.

Speed cameras ‘ineffective’;

Roger Lawson at the Alliance of British Drivers mentioned one of the primary causes of the rise in fines was “the switch from old fashioned Gatso-type devices with film cameras to digital cameras which by no means run out of film and where the processing can be automated”.

But Lawson added that there was small evidence to show that speed cameras decreased critical road accidents.

“In terms of price/benefit there are lots a lot more efficient ways to enhance road security than speed cameras,” he mentioned.

“Re-engineering roads is one particular potential solution: several speed cameras are situated exactly where a road could be enhanced by re-aligning it.”

More price-powerful options

This re-engineering could involve one thing as straightforward as installing a central pedestrian reservation.

Lawson mentioned: “This would encourage drivers to reduce their speed, and it is much less expensive than using cameras.”

Enforcing speeding fines, he added, incurred huge costs in issuing tickets, processing penalties and prosecuting instances by way of the courts.

But Paul Watters at the AA stated that the increased use of digital cameras did not necessarily imply motorists had been beneath surveillance about the clock.

‘Safety not revenue’;

“It does not usually adhere to that the police use digital cameras 24/7 as their back offices could not procedure masses of offenders just over the speed limit,” he explained.

“Moving from wet film to digital speed cameras does offer efficiencies, not least no longer requiring personnel to collect film.

“But authorities ought to nonetheless adopt enforcement based on collision and speed information information so efforts stay linked to attaining safety rewards not revenue.”

Watters added that far more than 3-quarters of AA members mentioned the use of speed cameras was acceptable.

‘Dangerous drivers ought to be priority’;

But the organisation maintained that less critical offenders – these who are caught driving only slightly above the speed limit – should continue to be provided speed-awareness courses in lieu of monetary penalties and points on their licences.

Watters mentioned the AA backed possessing camera thresholds set above the “bare minimum” – so, for instance, a camera in a 30mph zone would catch offenders driving at 36mph rather than 32mph.

“We certainly favour an method that first tackles the most harmful drivers travelling at higher speeds.”

Compare automobile insurance coverage – you could find a wonderful deal in minutes Get a car insurance coverage quote

Digital speed cameras blamed for enhance in fines

Oregon City fines Uber business For Failure to Get License

The city of Eugene, Ore. has fined the ridesharing business Uber $ 2,000 for failing to get a city license, and a city official says the fine could be repeated every day.

But the Eugene Register-Guard reported that regardless of whether Uber appeals the fine or pays up is questionable, given that the firm and other people like it have ignored fines and resisted regulation in other cities.

Uber began operating in Eugene and neighboring Springfield in July. As in other cities, that angered standard cab companies that have to get licenses and spend annual costs.

An Uber manager didn’t address the fines especially in a statement but stated the business would defend the rights of Uber users and help Uber drivers.

Uber customers download its app and hail rides from pools of independent drivers.

Copyright 2014 Linked Press. All rights reserved. This material could not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

« Earlier article

Security Urged In the course of Holiday Season in Virginia

Subsequent report »

Minnesota’s North Danger Partners Merges with Thune Insurance coverage Ne2rk

Insurance coverage news headlines delivered to your e-mail.

Get a totally free subscription to our well-liked email newsletter.

Oregon City fines Uber business For Failure to Get License

Oregon City fines Uber organization For Failure to Get License

The city of Eugene, Ore. has fined the ridesharing company Uber $ 2,000 for failing to get a city license, and a city official says the fine could be repeated every day.

But the Eugene Register-Guard reported that whether Uber appeals the fine or pays up is questionable, because the firm and other people like it have ignored fines and resisted regulation in other cities.

Uber started operating in Eugene and neighboring Springfield in July. As in other cities, that angered classic cab firms that have to get licenses and spend annual costs.

An Uber manager didn’t address the fines especially in a statement but stated the company would defend the rights of Uber users and support Uber drivers.

Uber buyers download its app and hail rides from pools of independent drivers.

Copyright 2014 Related Press. All rights reserved. This material could not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

« Earlier report

Security Urged During Holiday Season in Virginia

Subsequent write-up »

Minnesota’s North Risk Partners Merges with Thune Insurance Ne2rk

Insurance coverage news headlines delivered to your e-mail.

Get a free of charge subscription to our common e-mail newsletter.

Oregon City fines Uber organization For Failure to Get License

Can a licensing authority refuse to renew a car license because of any outstanding fines ?

;

Question:

Are there any possibility that a licensing authority can refuse to renew a car license because of any outstanding fines ?

Answer:

Yes there are but it must be made clear that this does not extend to traffic fines that have not reached legislated stages.

These stages are as follows:

• If an Enforcement Order has been issued in terms of the AARTO Act; or


• If a Warrant of Arrest has been issued in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act.

If you get an R114 statement of account from the licensing authority, you will note that it lists traffic fines, as well as licensing fees and penalties. Most commonly, licensing transactions are blocked because outstanding licensing fees and penalties thereon exist.

Regulation 59 of the National Road Traffic Regulations state the following

59. Arrear fees for licensing of motor vehicle or motor trade number

(1) If application is made for the licensing of a motor vehicle or motor trade number in a month following the

month in which liability for the licensing of such motor vehicle or motor trade number arose, arrear licence fees,

calculated at one twelfth per month of the annual licence fees from the first day of the month in which liability for

such licensing arose until the last day of the month preceding the month in which application is made, shall be

(2) If a person who owes any penalties or fees in terms of the provisions of this Act to any registering

authority or driving licence testing centre, applies for any transaction, the registering authority or driving licence

testing centre to whom such application is made, may refuse to effect the transaction applied for or, in the case of

an application for the licensing of a motor vehicle at a registering authority, refuse to issue a licence disc to the

applicant, until such penalties and fees have been paid, and may apply any amount tendered in settlement of such

penalties and fees due.

[Subr.(2) substituted by r. 25, GNR.1341 of 23 September 2003 w.e.f. 23 July 2004.]

(3) If a person who has committed an offence in terms of this Act failed to appear in a Court of Law and as a

result of such failure a warrant of arrest of such person has been issued, applies for any transaction, the registering

authority or driving licence testing centre to whom such application is made, may refuse to effect the transaction

applied for or, in the case of an application for the licensing of a motor vehicle at a registering authority, the

registering authority may refuse to issue a licence disc to the applicant.

[Subr.3 inserted by r. 16, GNR.404 w.e.f. 4 May 2007.]

;

In simple terms, what this all means is that licensing transactions may be refused if:

;

• Outstanding licensing fees and/or penalties on licensing fees exist;


• If a Warrant of Arrest has been issued against the name of the registered owner; and/or


• If an AARTO Enforcement Order been issued against the name of the registered owner.

A licence disc may also be withheld if the vehicle in question does not have a valid roadworthy certificate.

Licensing authorities MAY NOT withhold a licensing transaction because there are “outstanding traffic fines”. They may inform the alleged offender that they exist, but that’s about it.

But because eNaTIS automatically withholds licence discs when other conditions exist, licensing authorities who are part of the traffic authorities in the municipalities they operate, incorrectly tell people that it is the outstanding traffic fines that are causing the licence disk or other licensing transaction not being allowed. Effectively, the con people into believing that this is so, instead of being honest. It’s a very sad situation.

Best Regards,

Howard Dembovsky

National Chairman – Justice Project South Africa (NPC)

Can a licensing authority refuse to renew a car license because of any outstanding fines ?

It is legal for a person/s in unmarked car taking videos at intersections for which traffic fines are sent?

Question:

I would like to know if it is legal for a person/s in unmarked car to be taking videos at intersections for which traffic fines are been sent.

I have been watching 2 cars at an intersection in Port Elizabeth, white BMW and a red golf,who’;s occupants are not in uniform taking videos of cars and I know of a fine that has been received at that intersection.

There are no warning signs of cameras in the vicinity.

Answer:

I have heard of this happening in Cape Town and now you say that it is happening in Port Elizabeth too.

There are no TCSP guidelines for this type of exercise and since no measurement as such is taking place, they would probably not be deemed necessary.  My understanding of these exercises is that the persons involved in them simply park off and film people disregarding stop signs etc.  Insofar as warning signs go, if you think about it, a sign warning people to abide by traffic signs sounds a little bizarre and it is undeniable that if a command sign (such as a stop sign) exists, motorists have a duty to obey it.

;

In my view, there is little legally wrong with this so long as the traffic fines that get issued are issued by a qualified traffic officer.  It does however make me wonder why it is that prosecutors would be willing to prosecute these matters and not willing to do anything about footage captured on dash cams.  The other problem I have with this type of enforcement is the fact that the offender is not stopped at the time.  Disregarding a stop sign is as dangerous as disregarding a red traffic signal and sending people fines in the post has limited value with respect to road safety, particularly since doing so could lead to a collision and the injury/death of others.  There is absolutely no replacement whatsoever for visible, physical policing and what concerns me most about the proliferation of this kind of exercise is that it leads to lazy policing.  After all, if they can catch multiple offenders on video and send them fines in the post, why would they be interested in rather forcing compliance by stopping offenders at the time and letting others see that physical enforcement is happening?

;

Unfortunately, it all comes back to the fact that traffic policing has come to mean revenue generation and that is the long and short of it.

;

Best Regards,

;

Howard Dembovsky

National Chairman – Justice Project South Africa (NPC)

Also view:

Safe Driving at Intersections

It is legal for a person/s in unmarked car taking videos at intersections for which traffic fines are sent?

Fines could be elevated fourfold

A 4fold boost in the maximum fines offered to magistrates is to be introduced – which means motorway speeders could be forced to spend up to £10,000, and disorderly drunks £4,000, the government mentioned.

Courts will also be capable to levy limitless fines for the first time for the most serious crimes dealt with in the reduced courts – such as environmental offences – which at present attract penalties of up to £5,000 or much more.

Justice Minister Jeremy Wright mentioned the dramatic hike – the initial considering that 1991 and which the government paved the way for in legislation passed 2 years ago – would give magistrates the “higher powers” required to punish offenders.

But motoring groups mentioned the new fines had been disproportionate and could place men and women off challenging unfair speeding tickets.

Levels of punishment

Magistrates’; Court Recommendations set out how the acceptable level of punishment need to be determined according to the seriousness of the offence.

Beneath the proposed changes the maximums in each and every category will boost from:

• Level 1 – £200 to £800. Involves unauthorised cycle racing on public techniques.


• Level 2 – £500 to £2,000. Consists of driving a motor cycle without a protective helmet.


• Level 3 – £1,000 to £4,000. Consists of the sale of alcohol to a drunk particular person or getting drunk and disorderly in a public spot.


• Level 4 – £2,500 to £10,000. Consists of speeding on the motorway.

Mr Wright mentioned: “Economic penalties set at the proper level can be an powerful way of punishing criminals and deterring them from further offending.

“Magistrates are the cornerstone of our justice technique and these alterations will give them with higher powers to deal with the day-to-day offences that influence their regional communities.”

‘Fines have to be proportionate’;

The amount of fines collected reached an all-time high of £284 million at the finish of 2012/13 and remains on an upward course.

Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association, criticised the alterations.

“For the vast majority of drivers the prospect of the existing £2,500 fine is a fairly great deterrent against excessive speeding on the motorway,” he told the Every day Telegraph.

“We would not condone excessive speeding in any way but fines have to be proportionate to the offence and a single has to question whether growing the fines 4-fold is proportionate, and it almost certainly is not.

“If we had far more cops in vehicles on the motorway that would be a considerably a lot more efficient deterrent.”

‘Motorists will be deterred from going to court’;

Rupert Lipton, director of the National Motorists Action Group, said it was “disproportionate and draconian”.

“I believe it will have a serious chilling effect. We will find motorists will be deterred from going to court where they don’;t think they are guilty of an offence and there is a prospective challenge.”

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 allowed for magistrates to be give the power to impose unlimited fines for some offences.

But the government is only now tabling legislation to place that into impact.

Speeding offences have declined

RAC Foundation director Professor Stephen Glaister stated: “People who break the law should bear the consequences.

“But this appears such a wholesale modify to the method so you have to ask what was going so badly wrong ahead of? 

“Ironically we know that speeding offences have declined more than recent years and just last week the Division for Transport confirmed that, even right after taking congestion out of the equation, recorded site visitors speeds have been dropping for a decade on all kinds of roads.”

Fines could be elevated fourfold

Are £10,000 speeding fines fair?

Ministers program to give magistrates the energy to impose enormous economic penalties on drivers found guilty of widespread offences. Do these proposals go also far?

The government is thinking about rising the fines that can be set in the magistrates’; court. 

This could mean that potential penalties for offences such as speeding on the motorway are increased to £10,000.

Some fines to rise 4fold

The proposed increase would be the very first because 1991 – but some penalties will boost 4fold.

The fines have previously been set at diverse levels, reflecting their severity. The outlined adjustments are as follows:

• Level 1: includes unauthorised cycle racing on public methods. Up from £200 to £800.


• Level 2: involves driving a motorcycle with out a protective helmet. Up from £500 to £2,000.


• Level 3: involves being drunk and disorderly in a public place. Up from £1,000 to £4,000.


• Level 4: contains speeding on the motorway. Up from £2,500 to £10,000.

The Ministry of Justice reports that magistrate fines collected at the finish of 2012-13 reached a record higher of £284 million and continued to rise in the course of the last monetary year.

Justice Minister Jeremy Wright said that monetary penalties “set at the correct level” would be an effective punishment for offenders.

‘Why such steep rises?’;

Nonetheless Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the RAC Foundation, inquiries why the proposed increases need to be so steep.

“Men and women who break the law ought to bear the consequences.

“But this appears such a wholesale adjust to the method that you have to ask what was going so badly wrong before?” Glaister stated.

“Ironically, we know that speeding offences have declined over recent years.

“Just last week the Division for Transport confirmed that even right after taking congestion out of the equation, recorded targeted traffic speeds have been dropping for a decade.”

Edmund King, president of the AA, also criticised the changes.

Are far more police the answer?

“For the vast majority of drivers, the prospect of the existing £2,500 fine is a pretty excellent deterrent against excessive speeding on the motorway.

“We would not condone speeding in any way but fines have to be proportionate to the offence.”

King added: “If we had far more cops in vehicles on the motorway, that would be a more successful deterrent.”

A lot of motoring offences are dealt with by a fixed-penalty notice which is an on-the-spot fine. 

Other folks are heard in the magistrates’; courts, either since of the severity of the offence, for example, drink driving, or since a fixed penalty supply was rejected by the motorist and they want to appeal it.

Fines set according to earnings

But does it mean that if identified guilty of speeding on the motorway, a motorist will uncover themselves facing a £10,000 fine that could leave them in debt and take years to spend off?

This is unlikely to take place, as in magistrate’;s courts, the fines are set in line with the offenders’; revenue, and are associated to their ability to spend. 

“These proposals will only effect those who earn high incomes,” stated Jeanette Miller, managing director of motoring law firm Geoffrey Miller Solicitors.

“Offenders with low incomes will not see much of a distinction need to the proposals be implemented.

Tax on the wealthy?

“Taking drink driving as an instance, if a fine is imposed it is usually the equivalent of one-and-a-half weeks of the offender’;s net earnings.

“If an individual does not earn very a lot, they will not be required to spend the maximum fine.”

Miller added that for wealthy men and women, such as expert footballers, a £5,000 fine may possibly not be much of a punishment or deterrent but a £10,000 fine would be taken much more seriously.

She mentioned: “I consider this is a easy way for the government to impose a tax on the wealthier motorist which will not be met with considerably of a challenge from the basic public.

“After all, who desires to save funds for bankers and footballers of this planet?”

Convictions improve car insurance coverage charges

Gemma Stanbury, head of car insurance at Confused.com, stated convicted motorists could face greater automobile insurance coverage expenses as nicely as enhanced court fines.

“Our study has shown that there can be as a lot as a 34% increase in automobile insurance coverage costs for drivers convicted of exceeding the speed limit on a motorway.

“Excessive fines could nicely serve as a deterrent to motorists with a tendency to speed or drive recklessly.”

What do you feel?

Will increased fines for common motoring offences prove to be a deterrant? 

We want to hear from you! You can share your view on our message board under.

Examine car insurance – you could find a wonderful deal in minutes Get a auto insurance quote

Are £10,000 speeding fines fair?

Speeding motorists face £10,000 fines

Speeding motorists could locate themselves slapped with a £10,000 fine as element of a government crackdown on motoring offences.

The proposals just before Parliament would give magistrates the power to hand out heftier fines – but there are query marks more than whether or not this is a genuine attempt to deter drivers from breaking the speed limit or a cynical ploy to quit the appeals procedure.

A real speed trap?

Speed is 1 of the principal aspects in fatal road accidents and, just final month Brake, the road safety charity, named for a dramatic rise in the level of fines issued to motorists who commit the far more common, however no less dangerous, motoring offences of speeding and mobile phone use at the wheel.

And that is specifically what the government has completed by proposing a 4-fold improve in the maximum fines for speeding as nicely as placing up the maximum fine for using a mobile while at the wheel.

The probably government reforms imply magistrates can now issue fines of up to £10,000 to motorists caught speeding on motorways, although fines for breaking the limit on dual carriageways and other roads will increase to a maximum of £4,000, as will the maximum fine for making use of a mobile whilst driving.

It ought to be noted that the normal fixed penalty for speeding will stay £100 plus 3 penalty points. You’re only going to be hit with a larger fine if you discover your self located guilty in court.

Unlimited fines

For the first time ever, magistrates will also have the power to impose unlimited fines for a lot more critical ‘level 5’ offences such as careless driving or driving with out insurance.

Jeremy Wright justice minister , stated: “Financial penalties set at the right level can be an powerful way of punishing criminals and deterring them from further offending. Magistrates are the cornerstone of our justice method and these changes will offer them with greater powers to deal with the day-to-day offences that effect their neighborhood communities.”

But are these penalties set at the right level to deter offenders or to deter the appeals method?

A way to repeal motorists’ appeals?

As noted, beneath the present rules, a common speeding allegation can be dealt with by a fixed penalty notice of a £100 fine and 3 penalty points on your licence.

All motorists have the proper to appeal against the fixed penalty notice, but a failed appeal will see the fine enhance to £1,000, or £2,500 if caught speeding on a motorway, and the quantity of penalty points double to 6.

And it’s reasonable to assume that this would act as adequate of a deterrent to any spurious appeals and appears fairly in proportion to the crime committed – speeding offences have been in decline for a number of years, and the newest Department for Transport figures show the number of fatal or critical accidents on significant roads (motorways and A roads) fell by 7% in 2013, and by 4% on minor roads.

On roads with speed limits more than 40mph in non-built up places fatal accidents fell by 6% and on roads with speed limits up to and like 40mph in constructed up areas they fell by 5%.

Money maker?

So given that the number of fatal and significant accidents is on the decline, is this an ill-timed move from the government, or is it a way of bringing in more funds from motorists?

It is simple to be cynical when you think about magistrate fines collected (for all offences) at the finish of 2012/13 reached a record high of £284 million and continued to improve during the last financial year.

One thing’s for positive, it will certainly place the brakes on the appeals procedure. Who in their correct thoughts will appeal against a fixed penalty notice, no matter how convinced they are of their own innocence, if it could end in a £10,000 fine?

And even though those who break the law need to have to bear in mind the consequences of their actions, the level of punishment also has to match the crime.

What do you consider? Do we want the larger fines to deter speeding motorists? Or are these new fines a way to deter the appeals process? Let us know…

Speeding motorists face £10,000 fines

Louisiana Drivers Sans Insurance to Face Hefty Fines

In the final hours of Louisiana’s legislative session, lawmakers passed a $ 53 million fee hike on drivers who do not preserve vehicle insurance as essential by law.

Most of the income anticipated to be raised is slated to go to enhance the salaries of state police troopers. Other beneficiaries of the fee hike consist of local sheriffs and district attorneys.

Residence Bill 872 by Rep. Barry Ivey, R-Central, raises costs for the reinstatement of driving privileges if a driver has been caught without having insurance coverage, boosts penalties for not carrying proof of insurance in a car and needs a minimum $ 75 fine for a person caught in violation of the law requiring insurance on leading of the other fines and penalties.

Supporters say the bill tends to make it far more expensive for drivers to not have insurance than to get a basic liability policy.

“The intent of the bill was to attempt to discourage men and women from operating in an uninsured capacity,” stated Rep. Chris Broadwater, R-Hammond, 1 of 6 lawmakers who developed the final version of the measure.

Critics say it will hit men and women who already can’t afford Louisiana’s high car insurance expenses. They note the hefty fines were decided in a last-minute deal on the last day of the session.

“This is a $ 53 million tax that will fall mostly on the poor, and it was conceived in the worst attainable way, behind closed doors without having public debate in the last few hours of a legislative session,” mentioned Jan Moller, director of the Louisiana Spending budget Project, which advocates for low- and moderate-revenue families.

Gov. Bobby Jindal intends to sign the bill into law, spokeswoman Shannon Bates mentioned. The charge hikes on uninsured motorists take effect July 1.

Col. Mike Edmonson, head of the Louisiana State Police, said drivers in the state pay greater insurance premiums since so several folks drive with no insurance coverage.

“Until you have an effect on somebody in the pocketbook, they do not look to do things,” he mentioned.

The 1st slice of income from the charge hike, estimated to be about $ 2 million, will pay for an insurance coverage verification system that police officers can use to check insurance coverage on the spot.

The next $ 42 million will go to boost the spend scale for troopers.

Edmonson said the spend grid hasn’t been adjusted in 12 years, and he cited an LSU-Shreveport study that shows 10 other state and nearby law enforcement agencies offer greater beginning salaries for officers than the state police.

In his most recent cadet class, Edmonson said: “They got their first paychecks, and I had 5 people leave and went to other police agencies” because of the $ 35,609 beginning salary.

“I only want to be on an even field with everybody else,” he stated.

Beneath the pay enhance that Edmonson plans to phase in, an entry level trooper’s salary will develop to $ 46,610 with advantages.

Starting in the 2015-16 price range year, after the annual allocation to state police, sheriffs will get $ 7 million from the fee hike to reimburse them for housing individuals who are arrested for parole violations and awaiting a parole revocation hearing. The subsequent $ 1 million will go to help district attorneys employ new assistant DAs.

Copyright 2014 Related Press. All rights reserved. This material could not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Louisiana Drivers Sans Insurance to Face Hefty Fines