Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the general election in Could, making promises on the NHS, the economy and the household.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even even though the average vehicle owner pays a lot more than their fair share of taxes.

In fact, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes final monetary year, almost 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other autos spend £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That is more than UK businesses spend in business rates (£26.8 billion) and nearly the exact same quantity as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a further £6.1 billion in car excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and auto sales, business auto tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not neglect the numerous hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor traffic and parking infringements. They should add up to quite a fairly penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d feel the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to put up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They often have to drive in the dark, also, with many roads now blacked out after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in general – and potholes in certain – came out as the number one particular concern for drivers.

It is no wonder. Experts reckon potholes lead to up to 1 in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, particularly if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Expense analysis

The expense of motoring is also high on the list of worries.

Petrol costs may have come down in current months, but many motorists are suspicious of the massive oil firms and would like to see higher transparency more than rates at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and believe tolls should be dropped from key river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving bad

Then there’s poor driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving standards.

They would therefore like to see far more cops in cars to target harmful behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a call for better road security education inside the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Nicely, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to power in 1997.

Far more recently, the AA effectively campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we comprehend that elections are not won or lost on motoring troubles alone. Health, education and the economy tend to sway the benefits.

“However, transport and motoring are key to economic development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Condition: remove potholes, ring-fence funding, enhance parking

• Congestion: take away bottlenecks, increase bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: take away harmful junctions, enhance education

• Co-operation: take away conflict, enhance driver behavior

• Expense: take away unfair tolls, increase fuel cost transparency.

Drivers can show their support on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also question prospective parliamentary candidates on their plans to assist drivers, assuming they handle to stay away from the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed beneath CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the common election in Might, generating promises on the NHS, the economy and the household.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even even though the average automobile owner pays more than their fair share of taxes.

In reality, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes final financial year, nearly 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other vehicles pay £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That’s much more than UK firms spend in organization prices (£26.8 billion) and practically the exact same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a further £6.1 billion in car excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and car sales, company car tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not overlook the numerous hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor traffic and parking infringements. They must add up to very a quite penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d think the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to put up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They frequently have to drive in the dark, too, with several roads now blacked out soon after midnight.

In a current AA survey, the state of the roads in basic – and potholes in specific – came out as the number one particular concern for drivers.

It’s no wonder. Professionals reckon potholes lead to up to one particular in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, particularly if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Expense evaluation

The expense of motoring is also high on the list of worries.

Petrol costs may possibly have come down in current months, but many motorists are suspicious of the massive oil businesses and would like to see greater transparency more than prices at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and think tolls need to be dropped from key river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving undesirable

Then there’s negative driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving requirements.

They would therefore like to see much more cops in automobiles to target harmful behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a contact for greater road safety education within the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Nicely, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to energy in 1997.

Far more not too long ago, the AA effectively campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we comprehend that elections are not won or lost on motoring concerns alone. Wellness, education and the economy tend to sway the benefits.

“However, transport and motoring are crucial to economic development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Condition: get rid of potholes, ring-fence funding, increase parking

• Congestion: take away bottlenecks, enhance bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: get rid of unsafe junctions, boost education

• Co-operation: take away conflict, boost driver behavior

• Price: remove unfair tolls, increase fuel value transparency.

Drivers can show their support on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also question potential parliamentary candidates on their plans to help drivers, assuming they handle to steer clear of the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Will motoring matters affect how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the general election in May, making promises on the NHS, the economy and the family.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even though the average car owner pays more than their fair share of taxes.

In fact, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes last financial year, almost 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other vehicles pay £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That’s more than UK companies pay in business rates (£26.8 billion) and almost the same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a further £6.1 billion in vehicle excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and car sales, company car tax and insurance premium tax.

Let’s not forget the countless hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor traffic and parking infringements. They must add up to quite a pretty penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d think the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to put up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They often have to drive in the dark, too, with many roads now blacked out after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in general – and potholes in particular – came out as the number one concern for drivers.

It’s no wonder. Experts reckon potholes cause up to one in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, particularly if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Cost analysis

The cost of motoring is also high on the list of worries.

Petrol prices might have come down in recent months, but many motorists are suspicious of the big oil companies and would like to see greater transparency over prices at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and believe tolls should be dropped from key river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving bad

Then there’s bad driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving standards.

They would therefore like to see more cops in cars to target dangerous behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a call for better road safety education within the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Well, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to power in 1997.

More recently, the AA successfully campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we understand that elections are not won or lost on motoring issues alone. Health, education and the economy tend to sway the results.

“However, transport and motoring are key to economic growth in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Condition: remove potholes, ring-fence funding, improve parking

• Congestion: remove bottlenecks, improve bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: remove dangerous junctions, improve education

• Co-operation: remove conflict, improve driver behavior

• Cost: remove unfair tolls, improve fuel price transparency.

Drivers can show their support on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also question prospective parliamentary candidates on their plans to help drivers, assuming they manage to avoid the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 

Will motoring matters affect how you vote?

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the general election in May, generating promises on the NHS, the economy and the household.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even although the average vehicle owner pays much more than their fair share of taxes.

In fact, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes last financial year, virtually 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other automobiles pay £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That is more than UK businesses spend in enterprise prices (£26.8 billion) and virtually the same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a further £6.1 billion in car excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and car sales, firm vehicle tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not forget the countless hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor traffic and parking infringements. They must add up to very a quite penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d believe the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to place up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They often have to drive in the dark, also, with a lot of roads now blacked out soon after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in general – and potholes in certain – came out as the number one particular concern for drivers.

It’s no wonder. Experts reckon potholes lead to up to one particular in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, particularly if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Cost analysis

The expense of motoring is also higher on the list of worries.

Petrol prices may well have come down in recent months, but a lot of motorists are suspicious of the massive oil businesses and would like to see higher transparency over rates at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and think tolls must be dropped from important river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving undesirable

Then there’s negative driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving standards.

They would consequently like to see much more cops in automobiles to target unsafe behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a get in touch with for better road safety education inside the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Nicely, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to power in 1997.

More lately, the AA successfully campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we comprehend that elections are not won or lost on motoring concerns alone. Well being, education and the economy tend to sway the benefits.

“However, transport and motoring are key to economic development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Situation: get rid of potholes, ring-fence funding, enhance parking

• Congestion: remove bottlenecks, improve bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: remove unsafe junctions, improve education

• Co-operation: eliminate conflict, improve driver behavior

• Expense: remove unfair tolls, enhance fuel cost transparency.

Drivers can show their support on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also query potential parliamentary candidates on their plans to help drivers, assuming they manage to steer clear of the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the common election in May possibly, making promises on the NHS, the economy and the loved ones.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even though the average vehicle owner pays far more than their fair share of taxes.

In reality, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes final financial year, nearly 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other cars spend £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That’s a lot more than UK firms spend in organization prices (£26.8 billion) and practically the same quantity as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a additional £6.1 billion in vehicle excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and car sales, business automobile tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not overlook the numerous hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor traffic and parking infringements. They should add up to quite a quite penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d feel the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some assistance in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to place up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They frequently have to drive in the dark, also, with many roads now blacked out soon after midnight.

In a current AA survey, the state of the roads in common – and potholes in particular – came out as the quantity one concern for drivers.

It is no wonder. Professionals reckon potholes result in up to a single in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, specifically if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Price analysis

The price of motoring is also higher on the list of worries.

Petrol costs may possibly have come down in current months, but many motorists are suspicious of the massive oil organizations and would like to see greater transparency more than prices at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and believe tolls must be dropped from key river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving poor

Then there’s poor driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving standards.

They would for that reason like to see much more cops in automobiles to target dangerous behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a call for much better road safety education within the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Properly, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to power in 1997.

Far more not too long ago, the AA successfully campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we understand that elections are not won or lost on motoring concerns alone. Well being, education and the economy tend to sway the outcomes.

“However, transport and motoring are crucial to financial development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Situation: take away potholes, ring-fence funding, improve parking

• Congestion: get rid of bottlenecks, boost bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: get rid of unsafe junctions, increase education

• Co-operation: remove conflict, increase driver behavior

• Cost: eliminate unfair tolls, boost fuel cost transparency.

Drivers can show their help on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also question potential parliamentary candidates on their plans to assist drivers, assuming they handle to steer clear of the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters impact how you vote?

Will motoring matters affect how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the common election in Might, generating promises on the NHS, the economy and the family.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even although the typical automobile owner pays much more than their fair share of taxes.

In truth, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes last monetary year, practically 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other automobiles spend £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That is far more than UK organizations pay in business rates (£26.8 billion) and virtually the exact same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a additional £6.1 billion in automobile excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and auto sales, firm auto tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not neglect the numerous hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor targeted traffic and parking infringements. They need to add up to fairly a pretty penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d believe the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to put up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They typically have to drive in the dark, too, with many roads now blacked out right after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in general – and potholes in certain – came out as the quantity 1 concern for drivers.

It is no wonder. Authorities reckon potholes trigger up to one particular in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road security, specifically if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Expense evaluation

The cost of motoring is also high on the list of worries.

Petrol prices may well have come down in current months, but several motorists are suspicious of the large oil businesses and would like to see greater transparency more than prices at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and think tolls should be dropped from important river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving negative

Then there’s poor driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving requirements.

They would consequently like to see a lot more cops in vehicles to target dangerous behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a get in touch with for much better road safety education inside the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Effectively, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to energy in 1997.

More lately, the AA effectively campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we understand that elections are not won or lost on motoring problems alone. Overall health, education and the economy have a tendency to sway the benefits.

“However, transport and motoring are crucial to economic development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Condition: take away potholes, ring-fence funding, boost parking

• Congestion: eliminate bottlenecks, enhance bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: take away unsafe junctions, enhance education

• Co-operation: get rid of conflict, improve driver behavior

• Expense: get rid of unfair tolls, increase fuel price transparency.

Drivers can show their assistance on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also query prospective parliamentary candidates on their plans to assist drivers, assuming they handle to keep away from the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters affect how you vote?

Will motoring matters influence how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the common election in Could, generating promises on the NHS, the economy and the family members.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician appears keen to woo the motorist vote, even although the typical automobile owner pays more than their fair share of taxes.

In fact, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes final financial year, virtually 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other cars spend £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That’s more than UK companies pay in company rates (£26.8 billion) and practically the very same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a further £6.1 billion in vehicle excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and auto sales, organization auto tax and insurance coverage premium tax.

Let’s not forget the numerous hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor visitors and parking infringements. They have to add up to quite a pretty penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d think the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to put up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They usually have to drive in the dark, as well, with many roads now blacked out right after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in basic – and potholes in distinct – came out as the number 1 concern for drivers.

It is no wonder. Professionals reckon potholes trigger up to one particular in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road safety, especially if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Price analysis

The price of motoring is also higher on the list of worries.

Petrol rates may well have come down in recent months, but numerous motorists are suspicious of the big oil organizations and would like to see higher transparency over costs at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and believe tolls should be dropped from essential river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving negative

Then there’s undesirable driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving requirements.

They would as a result like to see much more cops in cars to target unsafe behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a contact for better road safety education within the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Well, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to power in 1997.

A lot more lately, the AA successfully campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we comprehend that elections are not won or lost on motoring troubles alone. Health, education and the economy have a tendency to sway the results.

“However, transport and motoring are key to economic development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Condition: get rid of potholes, ring-fence funding, enhance parking

• Congestion: eliminate bottlenecks, enhance bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: get rid of hazardous junctions, boost education

• Co-operation: eliminate conflict, boost driver behavior

• Price: take away unfair tolls, increase fuel price tag transparency.

Drivers can show their help on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also query prospective parliamentary candidates on their plans to aid drivers, assuming they handle to keep away from the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters influence how you vote?

Will motoring matters have an effect on how you vote?

Politicians from all parties have hit the campaign trail ahead of the general election in Might, producing promises on the NHS, the economy and the household.

But what about the motorist?

Sadly, no politician seems keen to woo the motorist vote, even even though the average auto owner pays much more than their fair share of taxes.

In reality, of the £582.6 billion raised in UK taxes last economic year, nearly 10% came from motorists.

Duty calls

UK voters with cars and other cars pay £26.9 billion in fuel duty alone, according to the AA.

That’s a lot more than UK companies pay in company prices (£26.8 billion) and practically the exact same amount as the government collects in council tax (£27.5 billion).

Motorists stump up a additional £6.1 billion in car excise duties, and £25 billion from VAT on fuel and car sales, firm auto tax and insurance premium tax.

Let’s not neglect the countless hidden ‘taxes’, such as penalties for minor visitors and parking infringements. They need to add up to very a fairly penny.

Exchequer mate

You’d feel the generous contribution to the chancellor’s coffers would win motorists some support in Westminster.

But no. Today’s drivers have to place up with potholes, puddles and parking permits. They typically have to drive in the dark, also, with several roads now blacked out soon after midnight.

In a recent AA survey, the state of the roads in basic – and potholes in particular – came out as the quantity 1 concern for drivers.

It’s no wonder. Specialists reckon potholes lead to up to one particular in 10 mechanical failures, costing motorists an estimated £730 million a year.

Potholes and poorly maintained roads are also a threat to road security, particularly if you ride on 2 wheels rather than 4.

Price evaluation

The cost of motoring is also higher on the list of worries.

Petrol costs might have come down in current months, but numerous motorists are suspicious of the huge oil organizations and would like to see greater transparency more than rates at the pump.

The abolition of tolls in England and Wales would also be a vote winner.

Edmund King, president of the AA, says: “We will continue to oppose tolls and think tolls need to be dropped from essential river crossings, as they are in Scotland.”

Driving poor

Then there’s undesirable driving. Motorists are increasingly aggravated by poor driving standards.

They would consequently like to see a lot more cops in automobiles to target unsafe behaviour such as tailgating and use of mobiles at the wheel.

There is also a call for better road safety education within the national curriculum from an early age.

But do Britain’s 35 million motorists have any political influence? Well, votes from Mondeo man helped to propel Tony Blair to energy in 1997.

A lot more lately, the AA effectively campaigned to outlaw rogue wheel clamping on private land.

King’s speech

But the AA is realistic. King says: “The AA is apolitical and we comprehend that elections are not won or lost on motoring issues alone. Wellness, education and the economy have a tendency to sway the results.

“However, transport and motoring are important to financial development in the UK and shouldn’t be side-lined.”

The AA is calling on political parties to commit to 5 Cs:

• Situation: eliminate potholes, ring-fence funding, enhance parking

• Congestion: remove bottlenecks, boost bypasses and capacity

• Casualties: eliminate unsafe junctions, improve education

• Co-operation: get rid of conflict, enhance driver behavior

• Expense: get rid of unfair tolls, improve fuel price transparency.

Drivers can show their assistance on twitter with #Vote4BetterRoads.

They can also query potential parliamentary candidates on their plans to aid drivers, assuming they manage to steer clear of the potholes on the campaign trail.

 Image: Voting by redjar is licensed under CC BY-SA 2. 

Will motoring matters have an effect on how you vote?

Vote: Greatest UK Truck Show 2014

Please vote for the best show you have been to in the UK or Ireland this year. The far more votes the better, so please feel free of charge to share the poll on your Facebooks, Twitter-spheres or what ever else you have. The far more votes we get the better thought we’ll have of the kind of show your all enjoying. Get voting!!

About these ads

Vote: Greatest UK Truck Show 2014

N.J. Assembly Delays Vote on ‘Electronic’ Auto Insurance coverage Bill

The New Jersey Assembly has delayed a vote on a measure that would enable drivers in New Jersey to use intelligent phones, computers or tablets to prove they carry auto insurance in the course of traffic stops.

The bill was due to be voted on Monday, but it was pulled from the agenda with no explanation.

The bill would authorize drivers to use an electronic form of their vehicle insurance coverage coverage. That means motorists will not necessarily have to carry a paper copy to prove they are covered.

The measure also states that the use of an electronic format does not imply the user consents to a police search of the device.

Drivers must now supply proof of insurance in paper form. The bill would permit them to use either paper or electronic formats.

Connected Articles:
Electronic Proof of Auto Insurance coverage Now Accepted in Delaware
South Carolina Becomes 31st State to Let Digital Proof of Insurance coverage
Florida Joins States Allowing Electronic Proof of Auto Insurance coverage

Copyright 2014 Linked Press. All rights reserved. This material might not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

« Previous article

NICB: Vehicle Thefts in New York Down 92% From Peak in 1990

Next report »

Mass. Vehicle Thefts Down 90% From Peak in 1975, Report Shows

Insurance coverage news headlines delivered to your e mail.

Get a totally free subscription to our well-liked e mail newsletter.

N.J. Assembly Delays Vote on ‘Electronic’ Auto Insurance coverage Bill

California Officials to Vote on Ridesharing at August Meeting

What you want to know:

• The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) could tighten its insurance regulations for transportation ne2rk organizations (TNCs) like Uber, Sidecar and Lyft


• Proposed modifications include 1) requiring commercial coverage to be in impact when TNC drivers are seeking for consumers and 2) requiring further types of coverage for TNC drivers


• The CPUC could vote on the regulations in its August meeting

---

Insurance coverage specifications for Lyft, Uber and Sidecar drivers might get tighter when the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) votes next month on adjustments to how it regulates the app-primarily based rideshare services. The smartphone-based solutions — technically named “transportation ne2rk businesses” (TNCs) — let drivers use their personal individual autos and smartphones to discover and drive passengers in require of a ride.

Taxicab drivers, rideshare drivers and rideshare passengers gave sometimes-heated public comments on the proposed modifications at Thursday’s meeting of the CPUC. The public hearing period lasted far more than an hour.

Michael Peevy, president of the CPUC, said from the meeting’s outset that a vote wouldn’t take place Thursday but could at the commission’s subsequent meeting in August.

Proposed alterations to CPUC regulations incorporate escalating the amount of insurance coverage that TNCs have to sustain and requiring that coverage be in effect while the driver has the app open and is waiting for a buyer.

CPUC commissioner Catherine Sandoval said the lead-up time to the August vote would permit the CPUC to meet its obligation to “make proof-primarily based choices.”

“I believe the fundamental query right here is: are the newly proposed levels of insurance … well-calibrated to the threat?” she mentioned, referring to proposed changes to regulations that the CPUC released in June.

Peevy said that the CPUC’s initial regulations, issued final September, had been California’s “move into a void” of rules for the ridesharing industry.

“We tried to create an successful regulation that didn’t throttle or kill a nascent business but also need some safeguards for the public,” he mentioned Thursday. “I think we’ve done that.”

CPUC commissioner Carla Peterman mentioned that the current proposal “will enhance the current circumstance,” but added that the insurance market lacks the kinds of coverage that would completely address the gaps in protection that come along with TNCs.

“Our insurance items are not yet evolved for someone who has a personal automobile and makes use of it in commercial activities,” she said.

State lawmakers are also grappling with how to regulate the budding industry.

Proposal Beefs Up Insurance coverage Needs

Presently, the CPUC requires at least $ 1 million in industrial liability coverage in the event of a crash. The coverage applies to “vehicles and drivers whilst they are providing TNC services,” according to the CPUC.

The CPUC’s most current proposal not only adds to those insurance coverage specifications — by requiring other kinds of coverage like medical payments, comprehensive, collision, and uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage — but also calls for the industrial policy to be in effect while the driver is waiting for a match.

The CPUC is proposing to break up “TNC services” into 3 periods that are defined as follows:

Period One: Begins when the TNC app is opened and the TNC driver is waiting for a match

Period 2: Begins when the match is accepted but the passenger is not however picked up

Period 3: Begins when the passenger enters the vehicle and continues till the passenger “safely exits the automobile”

The current regulations had “made clear that coverage was mandatory during periods 2 and 3.” The latest proposal, according to commissioners, “clarifies that coverage is also mandatory in the course of period one particular.”

Lawmakers are also creating legislation based on a 3-period breakdown of TNC rides in a piece of legislation called AB 2293. The bill passed the state Assembly in Might, with amended versions passed out of 2 Senate committees. Legislators will most likely revisit the bill when the session reconvenes in August.

Ridesharers Want Help for Well-liked Service

CPUC’s Thursday meeting brought a glut of supporters for TNC solutions, numerous of them drivers and riders themselves. Wanda Crane, a decades-extended resident of San Francisco, mentioned that she switched from the taxi sector to driving for Lyft since the latter was a “dependable, price-successful service.”

“Drivers want to have insurance coverage. I consider this is a fantastic compromise,” she mentioned about the CPUC proposal.

But some other rideshare supporters weren’t extremely supportive of the new regulations. Rideshare advocate Bryan Barton took to the podium to urge supporters to “fight these regulations.”

“They will destroy this sector,” he mentioned.

Cab Drivers Emphasize Public Security

Thursday’s CPUC meeting also brought many taxicab drivers and representatives to the public comment portion, where they aired unsavory anecdotes about TNC drivers.

San Francisco cabdriver Barry Taranto told commissioners that “I hate working Friday, Saturday nights,” when more TNC drivers are on the streets hunting for fares.

That practice, Taranto said, is technically against existing CPUC guidelines, as TNC automobiles are not properly insured to roam streets so that they can be hailed by possible passengers. Taranto also mentioned that Uber and Lyft drivers “sit in pickup zones” that are reserved for taxis and shuttles.

“We do things a lot more safely than they do,” he said.

Yet another cab driver, Ed Healy, also urged the commission to contemplate public security.

“This is 1 of the principles of insurance: commercial operate is more harmful than individual perform,” Healy stated. “These TNCs perform far more of their time for the duration of the most dangerous instances [on the road].”

Other taxicab representatives challenged the way that TNCs are at present essential to be insured, calling it “on-or-off insurance” that leaves worrisome gaps in protection.

Photo courtesy of Raido Kaldma

California Officials to Vote on Ridesharing at August Meeting