Driven: Ford Focus ST Diesel Wagon! (Too Bad It’s Stuck in Europe.)

Like every single U.S. automaker, Ford is not averse to wrapping itself in Old Glory when it wants to sell far more solution to patriotic ’Muricans. That’s why Ford F-150 advertisements feature the sort of gravelly voiceovers that make Clint Eas2od sound slightly effeminate—and typically include much more denim than the whole of Montana. But, despite calling Michigan property for a lot more than 25 years, Ford also continues to deny its house marketplace a big percentage of its global model range. And even though we do not really care if we do not get vehicles like the EcoSport and the B-Max, occasionally the neglect actually hurts, dammit.

As right here, with the diesel version of the Focus ST sold in Europe and other parts of the planet where compression ignition is taken seriously. To add some injury to that insult, the TDCi engine is also accessible in station-wagon type. This slight may not be on the very same level as that lengthy ago choice to deny us the Escort Cosworth, but it’s fair to say that a efficiency wagon with a 182-hp diesel engine and a stick shift fairly significantly fills the complete bingo card of stuff we’d like but cannot get. Which is why we took the very first opportunity to get behind the wheel of 1 for the duration of a recent trip to Germany.

Familiar—with Crucial Differences

The view from the driver’s seat is virtually identical to that in a U.S.-spec Concentrate ST hatchback. You sit on the exact same mega-grippy Recaro sports seats, grab the very same chunky steering wheel, really feel the identical pleasingly bulbous gearchange lever, and appear at the identical dashboard, featuring the identical trio of stuck-on supplementary dials for oil and enhance pressures and oil temperature. The only genuine clue that one thing is different, other than the Euro-spec km/h, bar, and Celsius scales for the instrumentation, is the truth that the rev counter turns red just soon after the number “5”.

The engine is a mildly reworked version of Ford’s Euro-spec 2.-liter 4-cylinder turbo-diesel, and even though it is far more than 60 horsepower adrift of its gasoline-powered sibling (with the maximum 182 horsepower arriving at a lowly 3500 rpm), it truly musters more torque: 295 lb-ft at 2000 rpm. On-paper functionality figures are predictably reduced, with a zero-to-60-mph time we estimate at 7.5 seconds and a 135-mph leading speed (in our testing, the gas ST hits 60 in about 6 seconds and has a 150-mph leading speed), but set against that, the TDCi has an official “combined” fuel-economy figure equivalent to 56 mpg on the optimistic Euro test cycle. If the car have been to be run via the EPA ringer, we consider it could best 40 mpg on the highway cycle.

Significantly less Enthusiastic, But Nonetheless for Enthusiasts

There’s no surprise that the diesel lump cannot match the enthusiasm of the gasoline engine. It lacks its spark-ignited sister’s enthusiasm for revs and—despite obtaining far more torque—has far significantly less torque steer in slower corners. But it is smooth and brawny low down, which means that you change gears about half as usually. A derestricted stretch of autobahn confirmed that there is no point trying to push the engine previous the 4000-rpm mark, where it appears to hit a slick of molasses. But tall gearing indicates that translates fairly much specifically to the claimed best speed in sixth—we saw an indicated 220 km/h (137 mph)—with the ST feeling stable and comfortable when driven flat-out. The engine thrums and hums when worked tough, with a sound symposer canceling out most tinkling harmonics at reduced speeds.

Despite becoming slower than the gasoline ST, Ford hasn’t softened the diesel version as Volkswagen does with the Golf GTD. That implies firm spring and damper settings, which do an excellent job of keeping the body in check when asked to make frequent directional adjustments. They also, even so, give a harsh ride over rough surfaces, specifically at greater speeds. The electrically assisted steering shares the gasoline ST’s fast rack and delivers similarly crisp front-finish responses (with much less power-on understeer), and the manual gearbox is just as slick as it is in the gasoline automobile.

Indeed, our test car’s wagon bodywork possibly produced more of a difference to the car’s higher-speed dynamic behavior than did the diesel engine. Ford’s numbers say the wagon is 53 pounds heavier than the hatchback, but even that relatively modest boost in mass at the rear of the vehicle is clear, generating it noticeably less willing to tighten its line on an eased throttle. Or, in other words, slightly significantly less amusing. The plus side is a reasonably cavernous load space—33 cubic feet with the rear seats in location, 53 cubic feet with them folded.

On the basis of the car’s versatility and fuel efficiency, we’re going to describe the diesel Focus ST wagon as the most sensible performance auto in the planet. Or rather, in those components of the world that are allowed to acquire such a compellingly distinct vehicle we’ve no doubt that U.S. sales for a manual-shifting diesel wagon would be restricted, but it’d be nice to at least be presented the selection.

View Pictures View Photos

Driven: Ford Focus ST Diesel Wagon! (Too Bad It’s Stuck in Europe.)