Only etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Only etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

26 Şubat 2015 Perşembe

Can I drive a commercial truck with link trailer if only back trailer has a load and front piece (trailer) is empty?




Question:


Can I drive a commercial truck with link trailer if only back trailer has a load and front piece (trailer) is empty?


Answer:


You may as long as the total load on the vehicle does not exceed 5 x the mass of the driving axle/s of the vehicle. Reg 239(3) requires that the drive axle must weigh 1/5 of the total load. If the load on the rear trailer is the only mass on the vehicle there is a very good chance that you are going to be overloaded due to a drive axle under load.


Hope you understand the explanation.


Alta Swanepoel & Associates







Can I drive a commercial truck with link trailer if only back trailer has a load and front piece (trailer) is empty?

30 Ağustos 2014 Cumartesi

Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line





f2208 YOU MAY NOT OVERTAKE
Question:


“I have a ticket for barrier line. The time I start overtaking a moving car there was safe to overtake in other words there is no solid line so when i’;m finished to overtake there is a solid line. So the traffic police give me a fine of R1000.. Can you explain me how it works or must go to court?”


Answer:


You may only overtake where you can do so starting and returning to your lane without crossing the barrier line. Normally there is a warning arrow before the barrier line that warns you of its presence.


Also view:


Overtaking Safely and Safe Driving







Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line

Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line





1428c YOU MAY NOT OVERTAKE
Question:


“I have a ticket for barrier line. The time I start overtaking a moving car there was safe to overtake in other words there is no solid line so when i’;m finished to overtake there is a solid line. So the traffic police give me a fine of R1000.. Can you explain me how it works or must go to court?”


Answer:


You may only overtake where you can do so starting and returning to your lane without crossing the barrier line. Normally there is a warning arrow before the barrier line that warns you of its presence.


Also view:


Overtaking Safely and Safe Driving







Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line

29 Ağustos 2014 Cuma

Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line





4a001 YOU MAY NOT OVERTAKE
Question:


“I have a ticket for barrier line. The time I start overtaking a moving car there was safe to overtake in other words there is no solid line so when i’;m finished to overtake there is a solid line. So the traffic police give me a fine of R1000.. Can you explain me how it works or must go to court?”


Answer:


You may only overtake where you can do so starting and returning to your lane without crossing the barrier line. Normally there is a warning arrow before the barrier line that warns you of its presence.


Also view:


Overtaking Safely and Safe Driving







Only overtake when you can start and return without crossing a barrier/ solid line

17 Ağustos 2014 Pazar

Professional FAQ: Is Technology the Only Solution to Texting and Driving?





Most of us can agree that texting and driving is harmful – but we nonetheless do it. About 660,000 U.S. drivers are making use of technology even though driving at any provided time throughout the day. In response to statistics like these, 44 U.S. states have created texting although driving illegal. Regrettably, multiple studies recommend that texting and driving laws do not meaningfully influence driver behavior.


Why? Sherry Dedman of the Distracted Driving Foundation points out that these laws are challenging to enforce: “Most folks who are determined to text while driving will just ‘palm’ (or try to hide) the device.”


There are also psychological reasons. Chris Thibault, co-founder of 52inc, the app development firm that developed anti-texting app Canary, notes, “It’s a discovered behavior.” If we hear that ping, we really feel compelled to verify our phones, no matter where we are – even if it’s illegal.


Some texting and driving laws function greater than other people, but they’re not the only answer. Educational programs alone have also come up brief. What’s left? A growing number of researchers say that a technological problem needs a technological resolution.Multiple apps at the moment obtainable either interrupt the connection between texting and satisfaction, or avoid drivers – both teens and adults – from texting in the 1st spot.


Taking the entertaining out of texting


Canary, released in 2012, is one particular of several apps championing the anti-texting and driving message. According to Thibault, “Canary just notifies parents when 1 of their teenage drivers is speaking on the telephone or texting even though driving. Generally, it tells on you.”


Unlike some competing apps, Canary does not block teen drivers from texting. What it does do, in Thibault’s words, is “provide a counter to the learned behavior.” Its creators hope that teens using Canary come to associate telephone use on the road with real consequences – if not from the cops, then from their parents.


Canary does rely on parents to be enforcers. Even so, Thibault says the strategy is well-liked with both teens and parents, adding, “We’re hoping these lessons will carry more than to when their parents can’t track them anymore.” The app is accessible for each iPhones and Androids. A lifetime subscription costs $ 14.99.


Taking the choice out of texting


For these nevertheless fighting the urge, Dedman recommends apps that stop texting (or other phone use) altogether:“Technological solutions which can not be merely overridden are a far better resolution. They take the temptation away from the driver. In several circumstances, a driver can’t use their telephone to text even though their car is in motion – normally at a price of 10-15 mph.”


Dedman is describing a few distinct apps, like Textecution. After activated, the plan blocks those in automobile traveling far more than 10 mph from receiving or sending texts. When the users come to a stop, they can text as regular. Every Textecution-enabled device is connected to an administrator, who is notified if a user uninstalls the plan. Parents or firms whose employees drive company cars might be administrators.


Textecution’s automation also comes with downsides. It can only inform that customers are moving, so passengers can not text unless they have administrator permission. If their administrator does not respond, they’re out of luck. The app is only available for Android, with a one particular-time price of $ 29.99.


Canary and Textecution are not the only anti-texting apps out there. Most smartphones now come with a free app, which generates distinct “away” messages for these who text or contact a user whilst they’re driving – though customers have to activate the app themselves. Other solutions, like DriveSafe.ly study text messages to drivers and can also be programmed with customized auto-responses.


Dr. Daniel V. McGehee, director of the Human Variables and Automobile Security Study Division at the University of Iowa, feels these messages can serve an critical function: “I consider an auto-response that says you do not talk or text whilst driving would be very successful, because it also has an educational element. The legislative component, the technological element and the educational element are the 3 legs of the stool.”


The very best way to stop texting and driving


Technological solutions can make it significantly far more difficult to text and drive – offered they’re employed. This is why Dedman believes legislative and technological remedies can perform collectively: “The ultimate solution is a law that needs anti-texting apps be installed on all phones or any such display-intensive device going forward.”


McGehee suggests that anti-texting apps should operate by default: “You can usually uninstall an app, but if it’s default, most people won’t – or won’t know how.”


Education also has a component to play, as lengthy as it’s done proper. Dr. Kelly Browning, executive director at Impact Teen Drivers, a protected-driving organization, notes:“Habits are hard to break. Drivers need motivation to modify their behavior, but research show scare tactics don’t operate in the lengthy term.”


And, as McGehee emphasizes, anti-texting and driving efforts may possibly be getting effects we can’t measure but. “If you appear at the history of safety belts, it took years for them to catch on. It just requires awhile for men and women to find the new regular.”



Texting image by way of Shutterstock




a23d1 p 89EKCgBk8MZdE







Professional FAQ: Is Technology the Only Solution to Texting and Driving?

2 Ağustos 2014 Cumartesi

Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!





dcbba Learner Driver stick people1 1024x700
We often discuss the impact of crime on road safety and the need to root out any form of corruption! On the Arrive Alive website we have also discussed this in more detail on a page titled “Corruption, Traffic Enforcement and Road Safety”. Car insurance companies will agree that incompetent drivers  - or let us say those who should not be driving but who are licensed drivers after having “bought” their licences are also adding to road crashes and car insurance claims! We encourage strict processes and effective testing before a driving licence is awarded – but this process should be fair! With our high unemployment rate in South Africa it becomes ever more important for job seekers to have a driving licence. What will be the effect if the driving licence test is not fair and where it becomes nearly impossible for the average guy or girl to pass the test? This will only encourage corruption as more young drivers will seek illegal alternatives to get a driving licence! This is best illustrated with a question emailed to the Arrive Alive website Question: “Good day I am not sure where I should go in terms of complaints. I was advised to go to the Southern African institute of driving instructors.  I have recently wrote my learners twice and have failed. I wrote at Randburg licensing department in July and after test I found out that illegal questions that does not comply to the syllabus was in it. One of the questions were what is an exhaust silencer? I failed by one point and feel that it was extremely unfair.   I feel that they deliberately made me fail.I hear that this has been going on for quite some time,why doesn’;t anyone care? and the department of transport denies such questions in test! Please may you advise me. kind regards” Answer: We referred this to Pat Allen from the South African Institute of Driving Instructors and would like to share her response: Thank you for this referral with respect to question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence.


  • Firstly, let me state emphatically that lawlessness on our roads is at an all-time high in the country. We agree that the public should know and apply the law thoroughly.

  • We are constantly receiving similar complaints (see below) about the computerised learners licence tests. We so hoped the computerised tests would stamp out corruption and give learner drivers a fair knowledge test as experienced in first world countries, but unfortunately, that is not happening, especially in Gauteng.

  • Despite forwarding complaints regularly to the National Department of Transport, Gauteng Provincial Department of Transport and the RTMC, since the inception of the Gauteng Computerised tests, the protestations and cries of the public who are failing repeatedly due to questions outside the prescribed syllabus are being ignored.

  • Several authorities have been positively defensive, claiming the public are so used to passing easily without knowing the whole law, (which is actually quite true), yet no effort to remove the troublesome questions from the tests has been made. Apparently those responsible have not taken the trouble to actually read the prescribed syllabus.

  • It seems impossible to sort this matter out. The authorities are ignoring all requests for intervention.

  • One would imagine that the authorities would be appreciative of the law-abiding citizens, who do not consider buying licences, but try to do things legally, yet the public are hampered in their efforts by failing their learners licences over and over again, despite knowing their work very well. Many people use this as an excuse to buy licences and to driving illegally, which is not an acceptable option.

  • Then, once they have eventually (hopefully) acquired a legal learner’s licence (with a more appropriate random selection of questions), and after a considerable delay and a lot more money than necessary has left their wallets, the struggle to find a test date sooner than 3 months ahead begins, in the hope that they will be ready to do their tests then, or risk forfeiting the moneys paid and re-booking months ahead, if not. Then the battle to find a legal driving instructor who has a high standard of integrity and training, and then to find a Driving Licence Testing Centre where tests are conducted according to the prescribed K53 test standard is a reality, and not a farce, begins.

  • No. It is definitely not a straightforward process to acquire a legal driving licence in South Africa. At SAIDI have even experienced a member who has been compelled (by being attacked with assegais, spears and sticks with a young woman in the vehicle who was about to do a driving licence test), to join another Association, (Mpumalanga Driving School Association at a cost of R10 000.00), thereby contravening our Constitution AND BEING REQUIRED TO IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COUNTRY WHERE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IS ENSHRINED WITHIN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, in order to be permitted to take his clients to a test centre in Mpumalanga, where he can get appointments within a week. He is so determined to continue this practise in order to survive financially, that he will risk being asked to step down as a SAIDI member. Being a breadwinner with 4 children to support, he can do nothing else.

Now I understand what is wrong with South Africa – no-one listens until people march in the streets breaking public property, (even school children now!), because those appointed to take responsibility for these matters simply ignore the public. This is not democracy working effectively. Speaking as a driving instructor with 35 years of experience, seen from my angle, road safety in South Africa is a hollow sham, despite billions being spent on numerous and ongoing expensive conferences, indabas and Summit meetings. So much for the Decade of Action. Unless the authorities start investigating these constant complaints, what hope is there of effective changes and fair learners licence tests? On behalf of SAIDI, we wish the complainant a test which is focussed on the prescribed syllabus next time. That is as good as it gets at the moment. If things change for the better, we will be the first to celebrate it with great enthusiasm. Let’s hope that someone will decide to correct the problems this time. If so, we applaud them.   Best regards,   P.A. Allen
dcbba pat allen   We would like to confirm that we will from our side strive to bring this to the attention of the decision makers at the highest level! Our road users deserve to share the roads with competent and licenced drivers  - and we need to address and remove any measures that promotes corruption in the road traffic environment! Also view: Crime as a Threat to Road Safety







Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!

Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!





c86d0 Learner Driver stick people1 1024x700
We often discuss the impact of crime on road safety and the need to root out any form of corruption! On the Arrive Alive website we have also discussed this in more detail on a page titled “Corruption, Traffic Enforcement and Road Safety”. Car insurance companies will agree that incompetent drivers  - or let us say those who should not be driving but who are licensed drivers after having “bought” their licences are also adding to road crashes and car insurance claims! We encourage strict processes and effective testing before a driving licence is awarded – but this process should be fair! With our high unemployment rate in South Africa it becomes ever more important for job seekers to have a driving licence. What will be the effect if the driving licence test is not fair and where it becomes nearly impossible for the average guy or girl to pass the test? This will only encourage corruption as more young drivers will seek illegal alternatives to get a driving licence! This is best illustrated with a question emailed to the Arrive Alive website Question: “Good day I am not sure where I should go in terms of complaints. I was advised to go to the Southern African institute of driving instructors.  I have recently wrote my learners twice and have failed. I wrote at Randburg licensing department in July and after test I found out that illegal questions that does not comply to the syllabus was in it. One of the questions were what is an exhaust silencer? I failed by one point and feel that it was extremely unfair.   I feel that they deliberately made me fail.I hear that this has been going on for quite some time,why doesn’;t anyone care? and the department of transport denies such questions in test! Please may you advise me. kind regards” Answer: We referred this to Pat Allen from the South African Institute of Driving Instructors and would like to share her response: Thank you for this referral with respect to question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence.


  • Firstly, let me state emphatically that lawlessness on our roads is at an all-time high in the country. We agree that the public should know and apply the law thoroughly.

  • We are constantly receiving similar complaints (see below) about the computerised learners licence tests. We so hoped the computerised tests would stamp out corruption and give learner drivers a fair knowledge test as experienced in first world countries, but unfortunately, that is not happening, especially in Gauteng.

  • Despite forwarding complaints regularly to the National Department of Transport, Gauteng Provincial Department of Transport and the RTMC, since the inception of the Gauteng Computerised tests, the protestations and cries of the public who are failing repeatedly due to questions outside the prescribed syllabus are being ignored.

  • Several authorities have been positively defensive, claiming the public are so used to passing easily without knowing the whole law, (which is actually quite true), yet no effort to remove the troublesome questions from the tests has been made. Apparently those responsible have not taken the trouble to actually read the prescribed syllabus.

  • It seems impossible to sort this matter out. The authorities are ignoring all requests for intervention.

  • One would imagine that the authorities would be appreciative of the law-abiding citizens, who do not consider buying licences, but try to do things legally, yet the public are hampered in their efforts by failing their learners licences over and over again, despite knowing their work very well. Many people use this as an excuse to buy licences and to driving illegally, which is not an acceptable option.

  • Then, once they have eventually (hopefully) acquired a legal learner’s licence (with a more appropriate random selection of questions), and after a considerable delay and a lot more money than necessary has left their wallets, the struggle to find a test date sooner than 3 months ahead begins, in the hope that they will be ready to do their tests then, or risk forfeiting the moneys paid and re-booking months ahead, if not. Then the battle to find a legal driving instructor who has a high standard of integrity and training, and then to find a Driving Licence Testing Centre where tests are conducted according to the prescribed K53 test standard is a reality, and not a farce, begins.

  • No. It is definitely not a straightforward process to acquire a legal driving licence in South Africa. At SAIDI have even experienced a member who has been compelled (by being attacked with assegais, spears and sticks with a young woman in the vehicle who was about to do a driving licence test), to join another Association, (Mpumalanga Driving School Association at a cost of R10 000.00), thereby contravening our Constitution AND BEING REQUIRED TO IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COUNTRY WHERE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IS ENSHRINED WITHIN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, in order to be permitted to take his clients to a test centre in Mpumalanga, where he can get appointments within a week. He is so determined to continue this practise in order to survive financially, that he will risk being asked to step down as a SAIDI member. Being a breadwinner with 4 children to support, he can do nothing else.

Now I understand what is wrong with South Africa – no-one listens until people march in the streets breaking public property, (even school children now!), because those appointed to take responsibility for these matters simply ignore the public. This is not democracy working effectively. Speaking as a driving instructor with 35 years of experience, seen from my angle, road safety in South Africa is a hollow sham, despite billions being spent on numerous and ongoing expensive conferences, indabas and Summit meetings. So much for the Decade of Action. Unless the authorities start investigating these constant complaints, what hope is there of effective changes and fair learners licence tests? On behalf of SAIDI, we wish the complainant a test which is focussed on the prescribed syllabus next time. That is as good as it gets at the moment. If things change for the better, we will be the first to celebrate it with great enthusiasm. Let’s hope that someone will decide to correct the problems this time. If so, we applaud them.   Best regards,   P.A. Allen
d5187 pat allen   We would like to confirm that we will from our side strive to bring this to the attention of the decision makers at the highest level! Our road users deserve to share the roads with competent and licenced drivers  - and we need to address and remove any measures that promotes corruption in the road traffic environment! Also view: Crime as a Threat to Road Safety







Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!

1 Ağustos 2014 Cuma

Professional FAQ: Is Technologies the Only Answer to Texting and Driving?





Most of us can agree that texting and driving is hazardous – but we still do it. About 660,000 U.S. drivers are using technology while driving at any given time in the course of the day. In response to statistics like these, 44 U.S. states have made texting while driving illegal. Unfortunately, several research suggest that texting and driving laws do not meaningfully impact driver behavior.


Why? Sherry Dedman of the Distracted Driving Foundation points out that these laws are difficult to enforce: “Most individuals who are determined to text although driving will simply ‘palm’ (or try to hide) the device.”


There are also psychological causes. Chris Thibault, co-founder of 52inc, the app development firm that produced anti-texting app Canary, notes, “It’s a learned behavior.” If we hear that ping, we feel compelled to check our phones, no matter exactly where we are – even if it is illegal.


Some texting and driving laws perform better than other individuals, but they’re not the only answer. Educational programs alone have also come up quick. What’s left? A increasing quantity of researchers say that a technological difficulty wants a technological answer.Numerous apps currently obtainable either interrupt the connection in between texting and satisfaction, or prevent drivers – each teens and adults – from texting in the first location.


Taking the exciting out of texting


Canary, released in 2012, is a single of many apps championing the anti-texting and driving message. According to Thibault, “Canary merely notifies parents when a single of their teenage drivers is speaking on the telephone or texting while driving. Basically, it tells on you.”


Unlike some competing apps, Canary does not block teen drivers from texting. What it does do, in Thibault’s words, is “provide a counter to the discovered behavior.” Its creators hope that teens making use of Canary come to associate telephone use on the road with real consequences – if not from the cops, then from their parents.


Canary does rely on parents to be enforcers. However, Thibault says the strategy is well-liked with both teens and parents, adding, “We’re hoping these lessons will carry over to when their parents cannot track them anymore.” The app is available for both iPhones and Androids. A lifetime subscription fees $ 14.99.


Taking the selection out of texting


For these still fighting the urge, Dedman recommends apps that quit texting (or other telephone use) altogether:“Technological solutions which can not be basically overridden are a greater remedy. They take the temptation away from the driver. In many instances, a driver can’t use their phone to text whilst their automobile is in motion – usually at a price of 10-15 mph.”


Dedman is describing a few distinct apps, such as Textecution. Once activated, the program blocks those in vehicle traveling far more than 10 mph from receiving or sending texts. When the users come to a stop, they can text as standard. Each and every Textecution-enabled device is connected to an administrator, who is notified if a user uninstalls the system. Parents or firms whose personnel drive organization automobiles may possibly be administrators.


Textecution’s automation also comes with downsides. It can only tell that users are moving, so passengers cannot text unless they have administrator permission. If their administrator doesn’t respond, they’re out of luck. The app is only obtainable for Android, with a a single-time expense of $ 29.99.


Canary and Textecution aren’t the only anti-texting apps out there. Most smartphones now come with a totally free app, which generates particular “away” messages for those who text or get in touch with a user while they’re driving – even though users have to activate the app themselves. Other solutions, like DriveSafe.ly read text messages to drivers and can also be programmed with customized auto-responses.


Dr. Daniel V. McGehee, director of the Human Elements and Car Security Investigation Division at the University of Iowa, feels these messages can serve an essential function: “I believe an auto-response that says you don’t speak or text while driving would be quite powerful, simply because it also has an educational component. The legislative element, the technological component and the educational component are the 3 legs of the stool.”


The very best way to stop texting and driving


Technological options can make it significantly far more challenging to text and drive – offered they’re employed. This is why Dedman believes legislative and technological remedies can work collectively: “The ultimate remedy is a law that calls for anti-texting apps be installed on all phones or any such display-intensive device going forward.”


McGehee suggests that anti-texting apps ought to operate by default: “You can always uninstall an app, but if it is default, most people will not – or won’t know how.”


Education also has a portion to play, as long as it is done right. Dr. Kelly Browning, executive director at Impact Teen Drivers, a safe-driving organization, notes:“Habits are hard to break. Drivers need to have motivation to alter their behavior, but research show scare techniques don’t function in the lengthy term.”


And, as McGehee emphasizes, anti-texting and driving efforts may be getting effects we cannot measure yet. “If you appear at the history of safety belts, it took years for them to catch on. It just requires awhile for men and women to uncover the new normal.”



Texting image by means of Shutterstock




e16c1 p 89EKCgBk8MZdE







Professional FAQ: Is Technologies the Only Answer to Texting and Driving?

Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!





6253c Learner Driver stick people1 1024x700
We often discuss the impact of crime on road safety and the need to root out any form of corruption! On the Arrive Alive website we have also discussed this in more detail on a page titled “Corruption, Traffic Enforcement and Road Safety”. Car insurance companies will agree that incompetent drivers  - or let us say those who should not be driving but who are licensed drivers after having “bought” their licences are also adding to road crashes and car insurance claims! We encourage strict processes and effective testing before a driving licence is awarded – but this process should be fair! With our high unemployment rate in South Africa it becomes ever more important for job seekers to have a driving licence. What will be the effect if the driving licence test is not fair and where it becomes nearly impossible for the average guy or girl to pass the test? This will only encourage corruption as more young drivers will seek illegal alternatives to get a driving licence! This is best illustrated with a question emailed to the Arrive Alive website Question: “Good day I am not sure where I should go in terms of complaints. I was advised to go to the Southern African institute of driving instructors.  I have recently wrote my learners twice and have failed. I wrote at Randburg licensing department in July and after test I found out that illegal questions that does not comply to the syllabus was in it. One of the questions were what is an exhaust silencer? I failed by one point and feel that it was extremely unfair.   I feel that they deliberately made me fail.I hear that this has been going on for quite some time,why doesn’;t anyone care? and the department of transport denies such questions in test! Please may you advise me. kind regards” Answer: We referred this to Pat Allen from the South African Institute of Driving Instructors and would like to share her response: Thank you for this referral with respect to question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence.


  • Firstly, let me state emphatically that lawlessness on our roads is at an all-time high in the country. We agree that the public should know and apply the law thoroughly.

  • We are constantly receiving similar complaints (see below) about the computerised learners licence tests. We so hoped the computerised tests would stamp out corruption and give learner drivers a fair knowledge test as experienced in first world countries, but unfortunately, that is not happening, especially in Gauteng.

  • Despite forwarding complaints regularly to the National Department of Transport, Gauteng Provincial Department of Transport and the RTMC, since the inception of the Gauteng Computerised tests, the protestations and cries of the public who are failing repeatedly due to questions outside the prescribed syllabus are being ignored.

  • Several authorities have been positively defensive, claiming the public are so used to passing easily without knowing the whole law, (which is actually quite true), yet no effort to remove the troublesome questions from the tests has been made. Apparently those responsible have not taken the trouble to actually read the prescribed syllabus.

  • It seems impossible to sort this matter out. The authorities are ignoring all requests for intervention.

  • One would imagine that the authorities would be appreciative of the law-abiding citizens, who do not consider buying licences, but try to do things legally, yet the public are hampered in their efforts by failing their learners licences over and over again, despite knowing their work very well. Many people use this as an excuse to buy licences and to driving illegally, which is not an acceptable option.

  • Then, once they have eventually (hopefully) acquired a legal learner’s licence (with a more appropriate random selection of questions), and after a considerable delay and a lot more money than necessary has left their wallets, the struggle to find a test date sooner than 3 months ahead begins, in the hope that they will be ready to do their tests then, or risk forfeiting the moneys paid and re-booking months ahead, if not. Then the battle to find a legal driving instructor who has a high standard of integrity and training, and then to find a Driving Licence Testing Centre where tests are conducted according to the prescribed K53 test standard is a reality, and not a farce, begins.

  • No. It is definitely not a straightforward process to acquire a legal driving licence in South Africa. At SAIDI have even experienced a member who has been compelled (by being attacked with assegais, spears and sticks with a young woman in the vehicle who was about to do a driving licence test), to join another Association, (Mpumalanga Driving School Association at a cost of R10 000.00), thereby contravening our Constitution AND BEING REQUIRED TO IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COUNTRY WHERE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IS ENSHRINED WITHIN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, in order to be permitted to take his clients to a test centre in Mpumalanga, where he can get appointments within a week. He is so determined to continue this practise in order to survive financially, that he will risk being asked to step down as a SAIDI member. Being a breadwinner with 4 children to support, he can do nothing else.

Now I understand what is wrong with South Africa – no-one listens until people march in the streets breaking public property, (even school children now!), because those appointed to take responsibility for these matters simply ignore the public. This is not democracy working effectively. Speaking as a driving instructor with 35 years of experience, seen from my angle, road safety in South Africa is a hollow sham, despite billions being spent on numerous and ongoing expensive conferences, indabas and Summit meetings. So much for the Decade of Action. Unless the authorities start investigating these constant complaints, what hope is there of effective changes and fair learners licence tests? On behalf of SAIDI, we wish the complainant a test which is focussed on the prescribed syllabus next time. That is as good as it gets at the moment. If things change for the better, we will be the first to celebrate it with great enthusiasm. Let’s hope that someone will decide to correct the problems this time. If so, we applaud them.   Best regards,   P.A. Allen
0364d pat allen   We would like to confirm that we will from our side strive to bring this to the attention of the decision makers at the highest level! Our road users deserve to share the roads with competent and licenced drivers  - and we need to address and remove any measures that promotes corruption in the road traffic environment! Also view: Crime as a Threat to Road Safety







Question/s outside of the prescribed syllabus for the learners licence will only further corruption!

29 Temmuz 2014 Salı

Spied! 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat: It Was Only a Matter of Time





6ea29 2015 dodge charger srt hellcat future cars car and driver photo 620349 s 429x262


Future Cars


arrow



The Hellcat V-8 sinks its claws into the Charger.



What It Is: A pair of Dodge’s complete-size, 4-door bruisers wearing front and rear camo, reported to be packing a version of the Challenger SRT’s Hellcat V-8. Caught testing in southeast Michigan, the partial cover-up on these Chargers can’t hide the presence of a huge hood scoop, aggressive chin and trunk-lid spoilers, and bigger exhaust guidelines. The white Charger pictured attributes plain honeycomb upper-grille inserts, following the styling lead set by the Hellcat SRT Challenger. While pictures alone can be misleading—often intentionally so—the earlier news that Chrysler has filed papers with the Society of Automotive Engineers regarding the use of the Hellcat V-8 in the Charger indicates that the carmaker is currently invested in finding a residence for said engine beneath the sedan’s hood. Combined with rolling stock identical to that of the Challenger Hellcat (20-inch wheels wrapped in 275/40 Pirelli P Zero Nero tires) and the presence of upgraded brakes in the kind of slotted rotors and Brembo calipers, the writing on the wall is relatively legible.


Why It Matters: As Chrysler’s standalone tuning division, SRT was responsible not only for the Viper, but also for injecting adrenaline into a quantity of Mopar goods in the name of functionality. So when the refreshed-for-2015 Charger debuted in New York earlier this year, we were a small befuddled that the manufacturer made no mention of what SRT may be cooking up for the 4-door muscle car. In hindsight, it’s clear that corporate wheels had been turning vigorously behind the scenes, putting the maker’s program to bring the SRT banner underneath the Dodge brand into complete effect. With that circumstance tidied up (the Chrysler 300 SRT is discontinued and the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT lives on), the subsequent order of organization was to make a big statement with the Challenger SRT Hellcat. How much better to stick to that up than with a 4-door barnstormer packing the exact same wallop? Following the Challenger SRT Hellcat’s naming scheme, we anticipate the Charger’s official title to be Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat.








Prime: 2015 Dodge Charger R/T. Bottom: 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat (spy photo).


Platform: In spite of wearing a fresh exterior, the 2015 Charger is constructed on an evolution of Chrysler’s LX platform, which also underpins the current Chrysler 300 and Dodge Challenger. Count on the Charger SRT Hellcat to make use of the very same or equivalent upgrades that Dodge performed on the Challenger to cope with the Hellcat’s prodigious output.


Powertrain: This car is all about the engine, in this case the Hellcat’s supercharged V-8. We expect the Hellcat V-8 to arrive packing the very same 707 horsepower and 650 lb-ft of torque it makes in the Challenger, its may well backed up to the identical ZF 8-speed automatic transmission. The thought of offering a 6-speed manual in the outsize sedan appeals to us dearly, but the Charger has thus far gone with out, so that choice most likely will be primarily based on purchaser demographics and customer interest. A single final believed: If Dodge decides to make Hellcat V-8 engine–equipped Chargers offered to law-enforcement agencies (we’re pondering Dubai, perhaps), it will forever change the nature of televised police chases.






Competitors: Chevrolet SS, Cadillac CTS-V, Top Fuel dragsters, Funny Cars


Estimated Arrival and Cost: There’s still plenty of time to slip the Charger Hellcat into showrooms as a 2015 model, but halo vehicles like this can usually transcend model-year designations with tiny effect on sales. That said—and thinking about considerably of the development was completed along with that of the Challenger SRT Hellcat—it could arrive as early as this fall. Pricing will most likely follow the Challenger’s lead, the Charger SRT Hellcat retailing for about $ 15,000 a lot more than the base SRT model, bringing it in around $ 65,000.


View Photo Gallery

Other Stories You May well Like







Spied! 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat: It Was Only a Matter of Time

3 Haziran 2014 Salı

Conversion of a foreign drivers license only apply to the Foreigner who do not have SA Citizenship





ea7ac did you know78299
Question:


I hope you can help me.  We are from the USA.  We have permanent residence here in SA.  My husband and I have exchanged our California drivers licenses for SA licenses after we became permanent residents.  My question is about my son.  He is also a permanent resident.


He went to study in the US after he matriculated here in 2012.  Now he is back living in SA.  While he was in California he got his driving license.


Is it possible for him to exhange it for a SA one now that he has decided to study here?  He has been a permanent resident since 2010, but was not eligible to drive at that time.  I cannot find any mention of this sort of thing on the official Dept. of Motor Vehicles site.


Answer:


Your son must start the whole process afresh by doing learners license and a drivers licence test in South Africa to be issued with a valid SA driving licence, because the regulation in place state that if you are a South African Citizen, permanent born in South Africa you are expected to have a valid South African drivers before a Foreign drivers licence.


The conversion only apply to the Foreigners’ who do not have SA Citizenship to convert their licence to a South African.


Also view:


Renewal or Replacement of RSA Credit Card Format Driving Licence


caa20 Capture37





Conversion of a foreign drivers license only apply to the Foreigner who do not have SA Citizenship

31 Mayıs 2014 Cumartesi

A/C Is Only OK - 2014 Kia Forte EX Extended-Term Road Test





2014 Kia Forte: A/C Is Only OK


May 30, 2014



344a3 2014 kia forte det lt 52814 600


In spite of my choice to reside in Southern California for the past 14 years, I dislike hot climate really much. I love air conditioning, particularly when driving. I like to shut out the noisy planet and drive in temperature-controlled splendor. But the A/C in our 2014 Kia Forte is only OK.


No matter what temperature I set with the rotary dial, the air only feels slightly cool, not cold. I had to double-verify that the A/C button was in fact on.


The A/C in the Forte will eventually cool the vehicle, but it takes a although. I had to drive with it blasting for at least a half hour ahead of I felt comfy enough to back it off. And the front vents are not in a good position. I’;ve complained about this prior to in Kias and Hyundais. The vents are placed so that they blow right onto your hands as you hold the steering wheel, which blocks cool air from reaching the rest of you.


You’;d feel both organizations would have corrected this by now. I imply, never they read this weblog? )


Ed described just before that our Forte has vents for the rear passengers, which is a bonus in this cost category.


But it’;s time to spend much more consideration to the driver.


Donna DeRosa, Managing Editor @ 17,243 miles



344a3 p 89EKCgBk8MZdE





A/C Is Only OK - 2014 Kia Forte EX Extended-Term Road Test